16 Comments
User's avatar
Rebekah Lee's avatar

Yes, see it through to the end.

Expand full comment
Alan Mairson's avatar

I was with you until the very end: "Afterwards, we will deal with you."

What does that mean?

Expand full comment
Ehud Neor's avatar

The European and South American countries that attack Israel—and it is an attack—will find that there will be a price to pay. Alan, I know that you see Israel as a dependency, but we are far past that, and when we move ahead with those who stand with us, those who stood against us will be left behind. They will become irrelevant.

Expand full comment
Ehud Neor's avatar

That’s all I meant.

Expand full comment
Alan Mairson's avatar

I'm not sure if I've ever referred to Israel as a "dependency."

"Those who stood against us will be left behind." >> I think you should entertain the possibility that the countries that now turn their back on Israel might one day come around. They are not completely lost causes. So if and when they one day say, "Yeah, we kinda f*cked up. We got it wrong. Sorry about that." -- I hope we have the compassion and strength to reply: "What a long, strange trip it's been! And yeesh -- mistakes were made, amirite? But we're delighted you're finally aboard."

Expand full comment
Ehud Neor's avatar

Meanwhile I've sobered up...a bit. I cannot possibly disagree with this sentiment of yours, Alan, but can you really see it happening? I also hope that we would be able to answer thusly.

Expand full comment
Alan Mairson's avatar

"but can you really see it happening?" >> Yes, of course I can! What other option do we have? ... Worth mentioning: I grew up in a Reform synagogue called Temple *Isaiah*. That guy was one of our best. And if Isaiah could envision a day of redemption, it seems like I should give it a try, too. :-)

Expand full comment
E. E. Negron (Emerald)'s avatar

The promises to Israel are irrevocable. But Israel has to keep fighting as if it is a lone wolf. I totally get it. I really do.

Expand full comment
Liba's avatar

It happened. Who thought Egypt? (I know, it’s pretty dormant, almost dead, but who wouda thought?). Abraham’s Accords? Historic and very unlikely. Also, the regimes could change: see Javier Milei. So ya. The others may yet see the light.

Expand full comment
Ehud Neor's avatar

Linda, you and Alan make for quite the one-two punch. It's actually a messianic outlook, if you ask me (which neither of you did:))

Expand full comment
Liba's avatar
Jun 9Edited

But the truth is, “Back off. Stand clear,” is still the best recipe. We can’t control the others (we can’t even control ourselves, but at least there’s a chance…)

Expand full comment
Alan Mairson's avatar

I like to think of my worldview as “measured messianism.” Or maybe “anticipatory messianism.” Also known as: Judaism. Rabbi Yohanan ben Zakkai got it right: “If you have a sapling in your hand, and someone should say to you that the Messiah has come, stay and complete the planting, and then go to greet the Messiah.”

Put another way: The job of Jewish messiah remains open. (Your life story, Ehud, might make you a perfect candidate for the position. Let me know if you need a recommendation.)

Expand full comment
Mary F Holley's avatar

After a couple thousand years you've realized you can't please the haters. Haters will hate because that is what haters do. I used to tell my juvenile probation students, "Look around, see who hates you. Make sure they're the right people."

Expand full comment
Ehud Neor's avatar

Your students were lucky to have you as a teacher.

Expand full comment
Carl Nelson's avatar

I'm all for it. But, frankly, no one here would mourn California's demise.

Expand full comment
Ehud Neor's avatar

I wasn't thinking California per se. Well, not on a conscious level. It's just the shortest distance to drag Iwo Jima. Next time I'll make it Oregon. Oh. Wait…

Expand full comment