In either case, I think this whole story is a huge psy-op. There is no spy who infiltrated numerous meetings. The entire idea is almost laughable.
Every top official at every meeting transmitted every piece of information to the Americans.
The Americans then transmitted this information to Qatar. Which means Hamas.
Worse -- some of the Israelis (meaning the top guys in these meetings) took the initiative to get on their knees & beg Hamas to control the shabaab, trying to make a deal with the devil until the last, instead of getting their shit together and ordering the area to be retaken, and cleared of the filth. Even after the invasion they were in their "Hamas isn't the problem" dreamland.
No spy necessary - just a bunch of incompetent assholes.
There may be a real name - in which case he's a fall guy - but they're all guilty of exactly what you're saying this spy is guilty of.
That's my take.
Oh also, if anyone knows that name he should name him. Break the law and go to jail. This is all total nonsense.
Because you have a good heart you cannot imagine the unimaginable. Since my last post, things are looking worse than I imagined. I am going to break for Shabbat soon. I have some followers who are actual journalists. I hope they take the ball and run with it.
Thank you for disagreeing with me in the nicest possible way, but I do not think that my theory is one that comes from an optimistic point of view. It's far worse than the spy who came in from the cold theory.
You’ll like this Diana. Was talking with someone in the security services. I asked him if he had heard about this. He wagged his hand saying, “yeah, everybody heard something.” When I told him what I had written, he said “no way!” I immediately thought of your reaction. So I was trying to understand without putting him on the spot if he knew more than he was allowed to say. He just shook his head and ended the conversation. The next day I saw him and we were talking about something else entirely, and during a pause it came to me to continue and I asked him: “Do you stand by what you said last night?” He looked at me and said: “All I can say is that I hope it is not true.” So we are here in a kind of limbo. I’ve said what I’ve heard. I’ll be holding back now unless there is something worth relating.
No, just deductive reasoning.
In either case, I think this whole story is a huge psy-op. There is no spy who infiltrated numerous meetings. The entire idea is almost laughable.
Every top official at every meeting transmitted every piece of information to the Americans.
The Americans then transmitted this information to Qatar. Which means Hamas.
Worse -- some of the Israelis (meaning the top guys in these meetings) took the initiative to get on their knees & beg Hamas to control the shabaab, trying to make a deal with the devil until the last, instead of getting their shit together and ordering the area to be retaken, and cleared of the filth. Even after the invasion they were in their "Hamas isn't the problem" dreamland.
No spy necessary - just a bunch of incompetent assholes.
There may be a real name - in which case he's a fall guy - but they're all guilty of exactly what you're saying this spy is guilty of.
That's my take.
Oh also, if anyone knows that name he should name him. Break the law and go to jail. This is all total nonsense.
Because you have a good heart you cannot imagine the unimaginable. Since my last post, things are looking worse than I imagined. I am going to break for Shabbat soon. I have some followers who are actual journalists. I hope they take the ball and run with it.
Thank you for disagreeing with me in the nicest possible way, but I do not think that my theory is one that comes from an optimistic point of view. It's far worse than the spy who came in from the cold theory.
Shabbat shalom.
Shabbat Shalom. What I reported? It’s true.
I await the next installment before speaking further.
You’ll like this Diana. Was talking with someone in the security services. I asked him if he had heard about this. He wagged his hand saying, “yeah, everybody heard something.” When I told him what I had written, he said “no way!” I immediately thought of your reaction. So I was trying to understand without putting him on the spot if he knew more than he was allowed to say. He just shook his head and ended the conversation. The next day I saw him and we were talking about something else entirely, and during a pause it came to me to continue and I asked him: “Do you stand by what you said last night?” He looked at me and said: “All I can say is that I hope it is not true.” So we are here in a kind of limbo. I’ve said what I’ve heard. I’ll be holding back now unless there is something worth relating.
😳
Agree fully, substack won't let me like your comment 🤔